|
I have an application that runs on SQL Server 2000. We have clients that use the Personal Edition or MSDE on their XP machines. If we upgrade to Windows 7, or get new Windows 7 clients, can we install SQL Server 2000 on them?
(comments are locked)
|
|
I found this update from Microsoft's Release Services: http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2009/10/23/sql-server-on-windows-7-and-windows-server-2008-r2.aspx The reason given for not supporting 2000 on Vista/Win7 is because of LUA/UAC issues.
(comments are locked)
|
|
SQL Server 2000 isn't supported on Vista+ OS's. The install will be blocked by Windows. Migrating MSDE to SQL Express may be the best option.
(comments are locked)
|
|
Hi, Although you can install SQL Server 2000 on Windows 7 with some workarounds, it will not work properly. You can see several errors in both the database server and in Enterprise Manager MMC. Only SQL Server 2005 SP3 or greater and SQL Server 2008 SP1 or greater are supported in Windows 7 by Microsoft.
(comments are locked)
|
|
There are several great answers here, but it is worth adding that there are ways of working around the fact you can't run it natively. The obvious one is to use SQL Server 2005 SP3 and run the database in compatibility mode for 2000. That is certainly not the same as actually running SQL Server 2000, but it is good enough for most applications and better for a few. Also remember that you can run an earlier version of windows as a virtual machine inside Windows 7. I have not tried that with SQL Server 2000, but I cannot think of any reason it would not work well.
(comments are locked)
|
|
The real answer is this - sql requires Windows Authentication and Microsoft has decided to change this or do away with it. Not to worry though - SQL allows you to log in without windows authentication. Install the program and do not select windows authentication to log in. Use a user name and password - works great on Vista - should work the same on Win 7 This answer has been clicked "down" by at least two people who haven't left a comment as to "Why". The answer rbeca gave seems plausible. Can someone say for certain if this is a good or a bad answer and why? Thanks.
Jun 20 '10 at 09:05 PM
Jeff Moden
(comments are locked)
|
1 2 3 4 next page »

